Electronic Comment Filing System

ECFS Filing Proceeding: 02-6
Name of Filer: BellSouth Corporation
Author: Theodore R. Kingsley
View Filing:
COMMENT (4)
Type of Filing: COMMENT
Exparte Presentation: NO
Date Received: 12/18/06
Date Posted: 12/18/06 3:19 PM
Address: Suite 4300 675 West Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30375-0001

BellSouth Comments CC Docket No. 02-6 December 18, 2006 Doc. #661142 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Schools and Libraries Universal Service ) Support Mechanism ) ) CC Docket No. 02-6 E-Rate Central Petition for Clarification ) Or Waiver of the Commission?s Rules ) Concerning the Disposal of Equipment ) Purchased Under the Schools and Libraries ) Universal Service Support Mechanism ) BELLSOUTH COMMENTS BellSouth Corporation, by counsel and on behalf of its wholly owned affiliated entities that participate in the schools and libraries universal service support program, supports the petition filed by E-Rate Central, which is the subject of the recent Commission Public Notice in this docket. 1 E-Rate Central argues that current rules address E-rate funded equipment transfers and trade-ins, but not ultimate disposition of obsolete equipment. 2 This is resulting in increasing confusion within the applicant community, which may feel constrained under current policies 1 The Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on the E-Rate Central Petition for Clarification or Waiver of the Commission?s Rules Concerning the Disposal of Equipment Purchased Under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Public Notice, DA 06-2371 (rel. Nov. 27, 2006) 2 Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, E- Rate Central Petition for the Clarification or Waiver of E-Rate Rules Concerning the Disposal of Equipment Purchased Under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (filed Sept. 29, 2006) (?Petition?) at 1-2. BellSouth Comments CC Docket No. 02-6 December 18, 2006 Doc. No. 661142 2 and procedures to relegate obsolete, out-of-service equipment to perpetual storage at eligible locations. 3 Moreover, E-Rate Central shows that grafting existing equipment transfer rules to equipment disposal scenarios (because, presumably, they are the closest rules that would appear to apply) may result in conflict with existing and controlling state procurement requirements. 4 In BellSouth?s experience, the lack of USAC guidance that specifically applies to equipment disposal also creates uncertainty in the audit process. Applicants risk being deemed in non- compliance with equipment transfer rules when the equipment is so old and outdated as to be of no functional value to the school or library. E-Rate Central?s proposed equipment disposal procedures are an excellent starting point for discussion. 5 The Bureau should encourage USAC to consider them and to engage in further dialogue with the SLP community on the matter. In BellSouth?s view, such procedures should take into account a reasonable range of ?useful life? for various kinds of equipment, and minimize any new regulatory burdens or requirements. In the meantime, however, the Bureau should clarify that current equipment transfer and trade-in rules are not applicable to equipment disposal, and that applicants are free to arrange for appropriate disposition of obsolete equipment in compliance with any applicable local, state or federal law. 3 Id. at 2. 4 Id. 5 Id. at 3. BellSouth Comments CC Docket No. 02-6 December 18, 2006 Doc. No. 661142 3 CONCLUSION The Bureau should grant E-Rate Central?s Petition by directing USAC to clarify that nothing in existing USAC policies and procedures prevents applicants from lawfully disposing of obsolete or surplus E-rate funded equipment. Respectfully submitted, BELLSOUTH CORPORATION By: /s/ Theodore R. Kingsley Theodore R. Kingsley Richard M. Sbaratta Its Atorneys Suite 4300 675 West Peachtree Street, N. E. Atlanta, Georgia 30375-0001 (404) 335-0720 Date: December 18, 2006 BellSouth Comments CC Docket No. 02-6 December 18, 2006 Doc. #661142 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby certify that I have this 18th day of December, 2006, served the following parties to this action with a copy of the foregoing BELLSOUTH COMMENTS by electronic filing or by placing a copy of same in the United States Mail, addressed to the parties listed below. +Marlene H. Dortch +Best Copy and Printing, Inc. Office of the Secretary The Portals, 445 12 th Street, S. W. Federal Communications Commission Room CY-B402 The Portals, 445 12 th Street, S. W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Room 5-B540 Washington, D.C. 20554 +Antoinette Stevens +Gina Spade Telecommunications Access Policy Division Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Wireline Competition Bureau 445 12 th Street, S.W., Room 5B-521 445 12 th Street, SW, Room 5B-550 Washington, DC 20554 Washington, DC 20554 antoinette.stevens@fcc.gov gina.spade@fcc.gov Winston E. Himsworth Executive Director E-Rate Central 625 Locust Street, Suite 1 Garden City, NY 11530 /s/ Lynn Barclay Lynn Barclay + VIA ELECTRONIC FILING